Evaluating the Performance of GAMS for Predicting Mortality Compared to Traditional Scoring Systems

Type: MA thesis

Status: running

Date: May 1, 2024 - October 31, 2024

Supervisors: Nastassia Vysotskaya, Lasse Bohlen (University of Leipzig), Andreas Maier

External Supervision: Mr. Lasse Bohlen (University of Leipzig)

This master’s thesis provides a critical review of the applicability of Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) for mortality prediction in clinical practice and comparisons of GAMs with established scoring systems. The study also evaluates whether using GAMs can increase the rate of accurate prediction and, hence, improve the health decision-making process and subsequent patient care.
SAPS and APACHE are traditional scoring systems used in health care to determine mortality prognosis. However, they have yet to gain much understanding due to their stiffness and the conditions imposed on them. Such models often incorporate explicit variables and linear dependency, while patients’ data involves many interactions and non-linearity. [1]
GAMs are a more flexible alternative that permits the utilization of non-linear relations and interactions between covariates. Therefore, they are a very useful tool for providing new insights into clinical data patterns [2]. This thesis focuses on the modeling background of GAMs and investigates their predictive capability by applying them to clinical databases.

Research Objectives:

  •  To investigate the ability of the GAMs to achieve a more accurate prediction of clinical mortality compared to the traditional scoring systems.
  • In this cross-sectional study, the difference in statistical accuracy and clinical applicability of GAMs will be discussed.
  • To offer the principles for the application of GAMs in the clinical setting.

Methodology:
The procedure includes building the new algorithm, which consists of GAMs, with the help of clinical databases and comparing it with the existing predictive scoring systems. Hence, evaluating models will involve using the auc-roc score, a statistical metric [3]. The study will employ the MIMIC-III clinical dataset [4].

Anticipated Impact:
Hence, by showing the utility of GAMs in enhancing mortality prediction, this study seeks to influence better and more personalized patient care approaches. As such, the findings inform the next research steps and the integration of higher-order prognostic models in the healthcare context.

References:
[1] Reza Sadeghi, Tanvi Banerjee, and William Romine. “Early hospital mortality prediction using vital signals”. In: Smart Health 9-10 (2018). CHASE 2018 Special Issue, pp. 265–274. ISSN: 2352-6483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2018.07.001. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352648318300357.
[2] Shima Moslehi et al. “Interpretable generalized neural additive models for mortality prediction of COVID-19 hospitalized patients in Hamadan, Iran”. In: BMC Med Res Methodol 22.1 (2022), p. 339. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01827-y.
[3] Shangping Zhao et al. “Improving Mortality Risk Prediction with Routine Clinical Data: A Practical Machine Learning Model Based on eICU Patients.” In: Int J Gen Med 16 (2023). PMID: 37525648; PMCID: PMC10387249, pp. 3151–3161. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S391423.
[4] Rui Liu et al. “Predicting in-hospital mortality for MIMIC-III patients: A nomogram combined with SOFA score”. In: Medicine (Baltimore) 101.42 (2022), e31251. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031251.